Shakespeare made the gullible mob famous - Mark Antony was able to get the crowd on his side with a silver tongue. So were Coriolanus and Jack Cade. The mob is fickle, blows with the wind, hasn't an original thought in its head, can be cajoled, manipulated, and molded in any form, is untrustworthy, gullible, and ignorant.
Alexander Hamilton knew this and argued with populist Thomas Jefferson not to leave governance to the majority who will always vote not their conscience but their pigs, their chickens, and their marriageable daughters. At the very least create a buffer between the leaders of government and the unruly mob.
Jefferson agreed, and we have a Senate, but Hamilton is turning over in his grave to see how this hallowed upper chamber has become just as venal, vacuous, and selfish as the mob. Democracy itself is the problem. There is no way that when the fractious, marginally intelligent people elect representatives no different from themselves, the republic is no different from a barnyard of bellowing, braying animals.
Winston Churchill said that democracy is the worst form of government except for all the rest, but he lived in a much more privileged, anointed time. With the civility of Parliament, the judiciousness of the House of Lords, the good sense of the British people, and the civilizing mission of colonialism, he could afford to limn the praises of representative government.
If he were alive today to see the chaotic, ungovernable mess Great Britain has become - an inchoate, identity-obsessive, fractious place - he would rue the day he ever considered democracy to be the best form of governance.
Margaret Thatcher did her best to preserve the first principles that underlay the British and American system of governance - small government, private enterprise, patriotism, low taxes and individual freedom - and Ronald Reagan followed suit. There might be some hope for democracy after all.
The fall of the Soviet Union showed the world the intellectual corruption at the heart of communism. Francis Fukuyama declared 'the end of history', and all nations looked forward expectantly to a universal era of peace and prosperity.
No dice. The world simply fragmented. Yugoslavia came apart. Muslims, long restive, burst out of their political somnolence and unleashed Islamic terror on the world; and worst of all neo-progressivism, a distorted, febrile, adolescent version of the foundational principles of Brandeis, Gompers, and LaFollette, gained ascendency.
If the world was to be such a contentious and predatory place, the corrupt, distorted progressive view of faux kindness, goodness, consideration, and compassion of these intellectual charlatans was to be the anodyne.
Reagan and Thatcher resisted and said that Charles Darwin had taught us a much more fundamental lesson. Survival, prosperity, and longevity depended on competition - the survival and dominance the strongest, the best, and the brightest - but the virus of progressivism had already spread too far to stop.
Conservatives were far more intellectually and philosophically sound. They understood human nature and how it fueled the world's interminable wars and civil conflicts. There had been only two extended periods of peace in the world - Pax Romana where the Roman Empire exerted complete, absolute control over the territories in conquered, and the Cold War where a nuclear standoff and the fear of mutually assured destruction kept fingers off the trigger. Other than that, five millennia of war.
Liberals, however, in a chillingly calculating way knew that despite the irrefutable lessons of history, the ineluctability of human nature, and the ever present fuel of Darwinism, people were still basically dumb, credulous, fickle, and profoundly gullible.
Any thinking man might assume that socialism as a political theory and vehicle of governance would never again be considered. After all, once the Berlin wall came down and the West was finally able to look inside the Communist empire, everyone could see the rot, the crumbling infrastructure, the empty shelves, the spiritless anomie, the concentration of abusive power, and the angry futility of the people.
However, American progressives were smart. All this might be true, they said, but the foundational ideas of socialism were still current, salient, and good. It was Stalin who corrupted the dream, the dream itself was still valid.
Most importantly these progressives understood the perennial, absolute gullibility of the masses, idealistic to a man, given to the most preposterous visions of harmony, equity, and communality, and unable to think for themselves.
Slowly but surely these progressives built a political movement which called out so-called capitalist greed, elitism, cronyism, and the immoral concentration of wealth. Elect us, they said and we will level the playing field, take from the rich and give to the poor, welcome all comers, and govern with consideration, compassion, and good will. There are no such things as enemies, just nations which have not yet seen the light of cooperation, compromise, and fellowship.
The fact that such fantastical propositions have never worked or even been operational didn't matter. Progressives chose to overlook the glories of Western civilization brought to the world through expansionism and power. They chose to overlook the law, art, literature, science, and philosophy created thanks to kings, emperors, shahs, and shoguns and focus on colonialism, patriarchy, and monarchical rule. The time for such exclusivity is over, they said, and a new world of progressive, inclusive governance is upon us.
Vote for us, they said, and we will make America a model of socialist values, humanitarianism, and emotional prosperity. We will reorder, reconfigure, and reform the American socio-economic system so that the people will benefit from affordable food, clothing, energy, and housing. The government will oversee programs to give to the people what they require and what they desire free of charge.
Finally a free lunch, 'From Each According to His Ability, to Each According to His Needs', a more compatible, harmonious society of equals.
The American people fell for it hook, line, and sinker. They bought the promise of this treacly offering saw the Second Coming around the corner.
As much as conservatives demanded a return to the foundational principles of the Founding Fathers and the philosophers of the Enlightenment before them; and as much as they pointed to the failure of socialism, the truth of Darwinism, and the invariable, hardwired traits of human nature, their words were ignored.
It gets worse. Not only are the principles of socialism once again being promoted and promised, but they are being applied Soviet-style in New York City and soon will be implemented in Washington, DC. The mayors of both cities have said 'equality will reign', the rich will be punished for their greed, the poor will finally get their fair share, the white privileged minority will be shelved, dismantled, and marginalized in favor of a universally multicultural society, and city services will be free for all, as they should be.
Who could resist such fairness, justice, and largesse? Why pay for the subway, exorbitant prices at the supermarket, and high rents?
There is not a scintilla of doubt that that the most prosperous and productive residents of the city will leave for warmer, more congenial climes along with their employment and their taxes; that the city will go bankrupt and ask for federal bailout, and will become as derelict and authoritarian as its Soviet forbears.
Yet Mamdani and DC Mayor-Elect Janeese Lewis George bang on with their reformist programs, punitive taxes, and reverse-racist policies. It will not end well, but the credulous, gullible, mob loves it. Life will finally return to normal without the predatory capitalists, land developers, filthy rich contractors and landlords, and elitist financiers.
It takes two to tango, but in this case, the people lead. If it weren't for the people's ignorance and inability to think, the likes of Mamdani and George would never see the light of day.
We are exactly as Hamilton understood - the unwashed, the uneducated, the fickle, the unschooled, the credulous, the stupid, and the gullible.
A conservative is in the White House but the outcome of the coming midterm elections is uncertain and liberals may gain seats in Congress. Europe and South America are other stories. There ultra-conservative parties have prevailed, and socialism, progressivism, and liberalism will soon be things of the past. Unrestricted immigration of those who are anti-Christian, anti-democratic, and anti-West finally forced Europeans to see the light.
Americans have no such cause celebre to force them back to reality. They will have to put up with the political charlatans they have elected, take the consequences, and then throw them out. Better late than never, but the damage will have been done.




















