Depending on your point of view and political perspective, Donald Trump is
either a vaudevillian, clown, circus performer, Las Vegas comedian, and buffoon;
a canny businessman who has made and lost billions but whose real estate empire
is a testament to brains, will, braggadocio, and chutzpah; and a man with a
coherent political philosophy who conveys his principles reasonably, rationally,
and convincingly – a quick learner and savvy manager.
Why can’t he be all three? The Donald Trump we saw on the stump,
at his early press conferences , and at staged promotional events is a showman
who loves glitz, glamour, bright lights, and applause.
The Donald Trump who is willing to make deals with anyone as long as those
deals are in America’s interest is no different from the man who strong-armed,
threatened, wheedled, pushed, and insisted until he got a deal in real estate,
a world there is no morality – only excavations, steel girders, and ‘TRUMP
TOWER’ engraved over the entrance.
Trump has made no apologies for dealing with Vladimir Putin. He understands
his geopolitical ambitions, his cultural imperatives, and his desire to
reestablish the Russian Empire. Trump also understands that in little over 35
years, Russia has been transformed from a beaten, debilitated, floundering state
into a superpower. Such a state cannot be ignored, and such a powerful,
amoral, and determined autocrat like Putin cannot be dismissed.
Why is Russia once again a superpower? Nuclear weapons, limitless amounts of
natural gas, a population that prefers coherence, stability, and confidence in
its leaders, and brilliant leadership.
Russia has retaken Crimea, established hegemony in Eastern Ukraine, has
defeated the West’s most dangerous enemies– ISIS and radical Islam in Syria –
and is forging ties with Europe and Asia.
How can Trump not deal with Russia? And who better than a New York
bare-knuckled street-fighter? In the face of such an implacable, smart, and
determined opponent, Trump is the obvious choice.
As for Donald Trump No. 3 – statesman, national leader, President for all the
people – there is no reason to think that he cannot succeed at being that as
well. He understands the principles of top management – select men and women
who subscribe to your philosophy, are loyal, competent, and independent enough
to challenge you on difficult decisions.
His Cabinet appointments – especially those responsible for national security
and foreign policy – meet all those criteria; and despite some early missteps,
they represent a strong coalition of CEOs, generals, and successful private and
public managers. The Trump Cabinet members are all, like Trump, free from the
yoke of moral exceptionalism, and subscribe to the same bottom line,
win-at-all-costs philosophy.
His relationship with the GOP in Congress is untested, largely because his
populist promises are so out of synch with the monied interests of the House and
Senate. American business wants cheap immigrant labor; and American
multi-national corporations want free trade. On the other hand the Republican
Congress applauds Trump’s rollback of restrictive and punitive regulations,
investment in the military, and lower corporate tax rates. Deals will be made.
So, what is the problem? Do we demand consistency, uniformity, and
moderation in our Presidents? Or in anybody for that matter?
There has been an unfortunate trend in American society to label,
particularly according to the criteria of race, gender, and ethnicity; and to
dismiss anyone, regardless of their achievements, promise, or talent, who is
guilty of any one of many sins within the canon.
During the campaign, Trump was automatically dismissed as a candidate by the
progressive Left because of his supposedly misogynist and homophobic views.
Major American historical figures are now suspect because of their association
with slavery and their names expunged from the public record. Regardless of
their contribution to the Republic, their valor in war, their courage and
rectitude, they must be erased from history including slave owners Washington
and Jefferson.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a great, courageous man; but he was also a
Lothario who cheated on his wife and was more of a sexual libertine than JFK.
Did these moral failings disqualify both men from leadership or high public
office?
Many women immediately disqualified Bill Clinton from any further political
consideration after he had sex with Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office. If he
cheated on his wife, they said, he will most certainly cheat on us. Yet the Bill
Clinton years look good in the light of recent White House debacles.
Ezra Pound and H.L. Mencken were both rabid anti-Semites, but their work was
notable. Immanuel Kant said, “'The Jews still cannot claim any true genius, any
truly great man. All their talents and skills revolve around stratagems and low
cunning ... They are a nation of swindlers.”
George Bernard Shaw said, “Stop being Jews and start being human beings”.
Theodore Dreiser said, “New York is a 'kike's dream of a ghetto,' and Jews are
not 'pure Americans' and 'lack integrity”.
Are we to burn their books? Consign them to the trash heaps of literary
history?
It doesn’t take much scraping of the surface to find something in public,
literary, scientific, sports, or Hollywood to offend our current sensibilities.
Gay slurs are common in our football and basketball heroes. Wilt Chamberlain
boasted of the fact that he had slept with 1000 women and the clock was still
ticking. In many people’s mind he was a degenerate, a profligate, and an
irresponsible reprobate. Yet, he was one of the greatest basketball players
ever and changed forever the way the game of professional basketball was played.
The point is not only that Donald Trump should not be excluded from consideration
because of low-bourgeois taste, arm candy, yachts, mansions, and trophy wives,
he should be applauded. He is America, or at least half of it; and
this America loves him for his outrageous, defiant personality, high-roller
lifestyle, and absolute confidence.
Not only should he not be criticized for his New York landlord behavior, he
should be cheered for bring to the White House and focused, bottom line,
business-oriented, profit-making mentality.
In the case of Mencken, Kant, or Pound, their questionable social principles
added nothing to their art or ideas. In the case of Trump, everything in his
past does indeed prepare him for high office in the 21st century.
His celebrity personality plays perfectly to his crowd who want WWE, MGM
Grand Hotel and Casino, beautiful women, and a brush-off of the dreary but
dangerous Washington Establishment.
His willingness to challenge anyone who gets in his way and fight,
intimidate, and threaten to get what he wants is exactly what his
supporters want him to do as President. America has for too long been the
world’s patsy.
His Cabinet nominees, address before Congress, and social media posts have
made it clear that he absolutely, positively, means to carry through on his
promises. While the Left may criticize his positions, they have to admit he is
doing what few politicians ever do – do what they say.
So, love the showman, admire the street fighter, and appreciate a President
who is loyal to his constituents and to what was was promised to them.
Saturday, March 4, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.